PRESTINENZI v STEEL TANK AND PIPE CONSOLIDATED PTY LTD

[1981] VR 421·YOUNG, CJ, KAYE AND McGARVIE, JJ
[1981] VR 421
PRESTINENZI v STEEL TANK AND PIPE CONSOLIDATED PTY LTD SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA YOUNG, CJ, KAYE AND McGARVIE, JJ 15, 16, 19 May, 02 October 1980
[1981] VR 421
Practice and procedure — Plaintiff injured in course of employment — Damages awarded unreasonably low — Insufficient evidence upon which jury could find contributory negligence — Judgment ordered to be entered non obstante veredicto — Whether trial judge entitled to order entry of a judgment inconsistent with the findings of the jury. . There is no power in a trial judge, without leave having been reserved, to direct judgment to be entered in a manner inconsistent with the jury's verdict. When a question arises in the course of the trial of an action whether there is sufficient evidence on which the jury could properly find that there was negligence on the part of the plaintiff, either of two courses are open to the trial judge: he should reserve leave to the plaintiff to move non obstante veredicto, take the jury's verdict, and then rule on the motion; or he should rule on the question before committing the case to the jury, and, if he is persuaded there is no evidence, he should direct the jury to answer the question in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed damages for injuries suffered by him in the course of his employment by the defendant. In answer to specific questions, the jury found that there was negligence on the part of the defendant, and that there was contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff and the jury assessed the plaintiff's damages and fixed the percentage by which the total damages should be reduced by reason of the plaintiff's negligence. On hearing a motion for judgment, the trial Judge upheld a submission on behalf of the plaintiff that there was no evidence upon which the jury could have reasonably found the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence, and contrary to the jury's answer to the question relating to that issue, he entered judgment for the plaintiff for the total damages assessed. On appeal by both parties,

""

Continue Reading This Report

[1981] VR 421

One-off Purchase

$25
This report only
Permanent access
PDF download
Best Value

Digital Subscription

$45/mo
or $450/yrSAVE $90
All reports included
Unlimited access
Cancel anytime
Don't have an account? Create Account